<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Irr on Ask Eijaz</title><link>https://askeijaz.com/tags/irr/</link><description>Recent content in Irr on Ask Eijaz</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://askeijaz.com/tags/irr/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Excel 365: Why Your NPV Is Wrong (and the XNPV Fix Analysts Swear By)</title><link>https://askeijaz.com/blog/excel-365-why-your-npv-is-wrong-and-the-xnpv-fix-analysts-swear-by/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://askeijaz.com/blog/excel-365-why-your-npv-is-wrong-and-the-xnpv-fix-analysts-swear-by/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, real talk: &lt;code&gt;=NPV(rate, values)&lt;/code&gt; is one of the most confidently wrong formulas in corporate finance. You select your cash flows, type the function, get a clean dollar figure, drop it in the board deck — and you&amp;rsquo;ve just discounted your entire project by one period too many. Excel&amp;rsquo;s &lt;code&gt;NPV&lt;/code&gt; assumes the &lt;em&gt;first&lt;/em&gt; number in your range arrives one full period from today, not today. Feed it your day-one capital outlay and it dutifully discounts money you&amp;rsquo;re spending &lt;em&gt;right now&lt;/em&gt; as if it happens next year. The result is off by thousands, and it never once shows an error.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>