<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Finance on Ask Eijaz</title><link>https://askeijaz.com/categories/finance/</link><description>Recent content in Finance on Ask Eijaz</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://askeijaz.com/categories/finance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Excel 365: Build a Loan Amortization Schedule in One Formula (No Helper Columns)</title><link>https://askeijaz.com/blog/excel-365-build-a-loan-amortization-schedule-in-one-formula-no-helper-columns/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://askeijaz.com/blog/excel-365-build-a-loan-amortization-schedule-in-one-formula-no-helper-columns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, real talk: almost every loan amortization schedule in the wild is held together with hope. You type &lt;code&gt;PMT&lt;/code&gt; once, work out the interest and principal for row one, then drag the whole thing down 360 rows and call it a mortgage. It looks authoritative. It even reconciles to the penny — right up until someone inserts a row to add a note, changes the term from 30 years to 15, or refinances halfway through, and the entire ladder quietly comes apart at the seams.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Excel 365: Why Your NPV Is Wrong (and the XNPV Fix Analysts Swear By)</title><link>https://askeijaz.com/blog/excel-365-why-your-npv-is-wrong-and-the-xnpv-fix-analysts-swear-by/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://askeijaz.com/blog/excel-365-why-your-npv-is-wrong-and-the-xnpv-fix-analysts-swear-by/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, real talk: &lt;code&gt;=NPV(rate, values)&lt;/code&gt; is one of the most confidently wrong formulas in corporate finance. You select your cash flows, type the function, get a clean dollar figure, drop it in the board deck — and you&amp;rsquo;ve just discounted your entire project by one period too many. Excel&amp;rsquo;s &lt;code&gt;NPV&lt;/code&gt; assumes the &lt;em&gt;first&lt;/em&gt; number in your range arrives one full period from today, not today. Feed it your day-one capital outlay and it dutifully discounts money you&amp;rsquo;re spending &lt;em&gt;right now&lt;/em&gt; as if it happens next year. The result is off by thousands, and it never once shows an error.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tiered Commission Formulas in Excel 365: Why VLOOKUP Gets It Wrong</title><link>https://askeijaz.com/blog/tiered-commission-formulas-in-excel-365-why-vlookup-gets-it-wrong/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://askeijaz.com/blog/tiered-commission-formulas-in-excel-365-why-vlookup-gets-it-wrong/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, real talk: if you&amp;rsquo;ve ever built a commission plan, a bulk-discount schedule or a tax provision in Excel, you&amp;rsquo;ve probably written this exact formula — a &lt;code&gt;VLOOKUP&lt;/code&gt; against a tier table. It looks confident. It returns a nice, clean number. And that number is quietly, cheerfully wrong, because it slaps one rate on the &lt;em&gt;entire&lt;/em&gt; amount instead of giving each &lt;em&gt;slice&lt;/em&gt; of it the rate it actually earned. Sales ops, RevOps and finance folks run into this all the time and don&amp;rsquo;t even notice, because the formula never errors out — it just over- or underpays and smiles about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>